Blog

Workplace operations insights

Practical guides for office managers building better hybrid workplaces. Learn how to optimize space utilization, automate operations, and support distributed teams.

Get workplace operations insights in your inbox

Subscribe for monthly guides on hybrid work management, space optimization, and workplace automation.

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Hybrid Work

Working Models 2026 » Overview & Comparison

By choosing the right working model, you can structure your team to avoid unnecessary costs and keep your employees completely satisfied.

Working Models: Which One Is Right for Your Team?

Work models describe how, when, and where employees perform their work. Full-time and part-time? That’s ancient history. By 2026, hybrid, remote, flex time, the four-day workweek, and job sharing will define the German labor market. 

If you choose the wrong model, you’ll quickly find yourself facing unnecessary problems such as excessive administrative costs and dissatisfied employees. That’s why, in this article, we’ll explain the most important models, outline their pros and cons, and highlight which legal changes are particularly relevant this year.

Work Models: The Basics

  • Work models define the scope (full-time, part-time), schedule (flexible hours, trust-based working hours, four-day workweek), and location (office, home office, hybrid, remote) of work.
  • By 2026, hybrid work will be the most common model in German companies. About 60 percent of office workers will work from home at least one day a week.
  • Since 2022, employers in Germany have been required to systematically track working hours, regardless of the chosen work model .
  • The Pay Transparency Act was strengthened in 2026 and now applies to companies with as few as 100 employees, with direct implications for part-time and job-sharing arrangements.

What are work models?

An employment model defines the framework within which an employee performs their work. It specifies three dimensions:

  • Hours worked: How many hours per week does a person work? Full-time, part-time, or on a very limited basis?
  • Schedule: When are employees scheduled to work? Fixed hours, flex time, shift work, or trust-based working hours?
  • Work location: Where is the work done? In the office, from home, in a hybrid setup, or entirely remotely?

These three dimensions can be combined. A full-time employee can work on a flex-time schedule and in a hybrid model. A part-time employee can work exclusively in the office on a fixed shift. These combinations give rise to the modelswe examine in this article.

{{cta}}

The main work models by working hours

The number of hours worked forms the basis of every employment contract. These four models cover over 95 percent of all employment relationships in Germany.

Full-time

In Germany, full-time employment generally involves 35 to 40 hours per week, depending on the collective bargaining agreement or the industry. Full-time positions remain the norm, particularly in manufacturing, skilled trades, and traditional administrative professions.

  • Advantages: Full salary, comprehensive benefits, clear career path. 
  • Disadvantages: Less flexibility for family, continuing education, or side jobs.

Part-time

Part-time work involves fewer hours than the full weekly work schedule. Since 2019, employees have been entitled under the Bridge Part-Time Work Act to a temporary reduction in working hours with the right to return to full-time work.

  • Advantages: Better work-life balance, more time for other commitments. 
  • Disadvantages: Lower income, often slower career advancement, lower pension benefits.

Part-time employment (mini-job)

Since 2026, mini-jobs have been capped at 603 euros per month. They are suitable for students, retirees, or as a second job.

  • Advantages: Tax- and social security-free for employees, flexible scheduling, easy entry into the job market.

Disadvantages: No automatic coverage under health and unemployment insurance, limited pension benefits, no protection in the event of unemployment.

Four-day workweek

The four-day workweek reduces the number of working days to four, often without a reduction in pay. In Germany, it was tested in several pilot projects in 2024. Initial results show higher productivity per hour, but also challenges in service industries with fixed opening hours.

  • Benefits: More time to recover, lower absenteeism rates, a strong selling point in recruitment.
  • Disadvantages: Difficult to implement in shift-based and service-oriented businesses, higher demands on process efficiency, potential losses in terms of availability.

Work Models Based on Work Hours Distribution

While the total number of hours sets the framework, the distribution of working hours determines daily life. These four models are the most common in Germany.

Flexible work hours

Under a flex-time schedule, employees determine the start and end times of their daily work within a set framework. A core period (for example, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.) generally specifies when all employees must be available. Outside of these hours, employees are free to manage their own schedules.

  • Benefits: Better compatibility with doctor's appointments, family commitments, or commuting times; higher employee satisfaction; lower absenteeism. 
  • Disadvantages: Requires reliable time tracking, makes it difficult to coordinate spontaneously outside of core hours, and makes team coordination more complex.

Flexible work hours

What counts here is only the result, not the number of hours worked. Employees organize their own working hours. It is important to note that even trust-based working hours are not exempt from the legal requirement to track working hours. Employers must document when work was performed, even if the distribution of those hours is left up to the employee.

  • Advantages: High degree of autonomy, a strong selling point when recruiting skilled workers, focus on results rather than attendance. 
  • Disadvantages: Risk of unpaid overtime; difficult to implement without a mature management culture; requires documentation despite flexible scheduling.

Shift work

Shift schedules (early, late, and night shifts) are primarily found in manufacturing, healthcare, logistics, and retail. They require reliable shift schedules and transparent communication.

  • Advantages: The company is always open, employees often receive shift premiums, and there is a clear separation between work and personal time. 
  • Disadvantages: Health risks due to irregular work schedules (especially night shifts), difficulty balancing work and family life, higher employee turnover in industries with unattractive shifts.

Job sharing

In job sharing, two or more people share a full-time position. It is becoming increasingly popular, especially in leadership positions. However, with the stricter Pay Transparency Act of 2026, legal requirements are also coming to the forefront here, as both job-sharing partners must be paid equally for work of equal value and the company must be able to document this comparability.

  • Advantages: Makes leadership positions accessible on a part-time basis, combines two skill sets in a single role, and ensures continuity in the event of illness or vacation. 
  • Disadvantages: Significant coordination effort required between partners, complex reporting and documentation requirements, and, in practice, often additional work for the supporting team.

Work Models by Location

The workplace has undergone the most significant changes in recent years. Four models now define the day-to-day operations of German companies.

Office work (in-person)

For decades, the traditional office setup was the standard model. It still works today in situations where physical presence is necessary. For companies, this model involves the least organizational effort, as it features fixed workstations and predictable utilization. The trade-off is high fixed costs for office space and a limited pool of applicants, since many talented individuals today expect hybrid or remote options.

  • Advantages: Easy coordination, direct communication within the team, strong corporate culture, minimal technical requirements.
  • Disadvantages: High fixed costs for office space, long commutes for employees, and reduced appeal to job candidates.

Work from home

In this model, employees work from home on a permanent basis or at least on a regular basis. There is still no legal right to work from home in Germany, but many companies offer it on a voluntary basis. This is also necessary these days, as many qualified workers expect at least the option to work from home.

  • Advantages: No more commuting time, improved concentration, better work-life balance.
  • Disadvantages: Risk of isolation and weaker team cohesion, more difficult to coordinate spontaneously, higher demands on self-organization and technical equipment at home.

{{hint-box}}

Hybrid Work

Hybrid work combines in-office work with location-flexible work according to clear guidelines. There are several typical models:

  • Office-First: Three to four days in the office, one to two days working from home.
  • Remote-First: Remote work is the default; employees come into the office only on specific days or for specific occasions.
  • Free Choice: Employees decide where to work each day within defined guidelines.

The choice of model primarily affects the organizational effort required. However, the advantages and disadvantages of the hybrid model generally apply to all three variants:

  • Advantages: Combines periods of focused work at home with collaboration in the office, reduces office space through desk sharing, and serves as a strong selling point in recruitment. 
  • Disadvantages: Greater coordination effort, requires booking and attendance systems, risk of unequal opportunities between office-based and remote workers (“proximity bias”).

Remote Work

Remote work refers to working entirely from any location, often from abroad. Tax, social security, and labor law issues become complex as soon as someone works from another EU country for more than 25 days a year.

  • Advantages: Access to an international talent pool, no office space costs, and maximum flexibility for employees.
  • Disadvantages: Complex legal and tax issues related to assignments abroad, challenges in building a team culture, and higher demands on leadership and digital communication.

{{onpage-cta}}

Work Models of the Future: What Will Change in 2026?

The labor market never stands still. Almost in lockstep, new regulations and laws are emerging, designed to protect both employers and employees while maintaining a balance. Four legal and technological developments are shaping work models in Germany in 2026:

  1. Digital time tracking requirement now fully in effect: Since the Federal Labor Court (BAG) ruling in 2022, employers have been required to systematically track working hours. What has been missing so far is specific legal implementation: The planned Time Tracking Act is set to make electronic tracking mandatory in the course of 2026. 
  2. Pay Transparency Act Expanded: The EU Pay Transparency Directive has been transposed into German law and now applies to companies with 100 or more employees. Companies must be able to disclose their pay structures. This has a direct impact on part-time, job-sharing, and hybrid models, as anyone filling a reduced-hour position must be paid proportionally the same as a full-time employee performing the same duties.
  3. AI Governance in Human Resources: With the introduction of the EU AI Act, stricter rules for AI-powered HR systems will take effect in 2026. Tools used in recruiting or performance evaluation are considered high-risk applications and are subject to documentation and transparency requirements. Furthermore, attendance analyses and workload reports must not generate movement profiles of individual persons. Evaluations must be anonymized at the team or facility level.
  4. Space optimization as a cost factor: Office costs are among the largest fixed expenses for many companies. Companies that allow employees to work in a hybrid model and don’t know who is actually in the office and when end up paying for unused square footage. Accurate occupancy data is essential for making informed space-related decisions and ensures that companies can reduce costs.

{{onpage-cta}}

Which work model is right for which company?

There is no one-size-fits-all model. Companies that copy an approach simply because it has worked reliably for others underestimate how much the right choice depends on their own specific circumstances. Four factors set the direction:

  1. Industry and job profile: Knowledge work allows for more flexibility than the manufacturing sector.
  2. Team size and culture: Small teams often get by with informal agreements, while larger teams need clear rules and tools.
  3. Employee expectations: Young talent expects hybrid and remote work options. According to PwC, for 44 percent of employees, the option to work from home is a decisive factor in choosing an employer, while for another 42 percent, it is important but not decisive.
  4. IT infrastructure: Hybrid work only works with reliable time-tracking software, attendance tracking, and an integrated HR system.

Anyone introducing hybrid or flexible models should therefore clarify early on how desk sharing will be organized and how utilization will be measured.

Alternatives

5 Powerful desk.ly Alternatives for Desk Booking

Tools like desk.ly help to bring structure to hybrid working. But is it the right tool for your team? Which alternatives will bring organization, flexibility and acceptance to your office?

Desk.ly Alternatives: 5 Great Desk Booking Tools That Suit Your Team

You are using desk.ly or just considering whether it is the right tool for you? In this article, you will find five alternatives to desk.ly. You will learn what features they offer, how they differ in price and for whom they are suitable. This way, you can decide which desk booking software suits you best.

Important selection criteria for a desk booking software as an alternative to desk.ly

If you reach your limits with desk.ly, it's worth taking a close look when switching. Many tools may seem similar at first glance – but they differ significantly in their day-to-day work. These points will help you to select a truly suitable alternative:

  • Intuitive interface – no training required: A common point in user reviews: new employees can't find their way around desk.ly immediately. If you are looking for an alternative, it should be as self-explanatory as possible to use – whether via an app or in a browser. Bookings must work quickly without the need for instructions. Bookings must also remain clear on mobile phones – otherwise acceptance by the team will suffer.
  • Flexible booking rules: It should be possible to customize booking rules. For example: Who can book and when? Which teams have access to which zones? How long are bookings valid for? What happens in the event of a no-show? A good tool allows for differentiated settings – per location, team or resource type.
  • Clearly structured roles and rights: Not everyone in the company needs the same rights. It should be possible to control booking rights in a targeted manner – for example, for admins, team leaders or specific departments. Even with multiple locations, the system should be able to clearly regulate who can book or manage what.
  • Seamless integration into existing tools: A good alternative to desk.ly should integrate easily into existing systems. These include Microsoft 365, Outlook, Google Workspace, Slack and any other tools that may be used in the workplace. Ideally, bookings should be able to be made directly from calendars or chats – without having to switch systems.
  • Meaningful evaluations without additional effort: The utilization of seats, rooms and locations should be visible at a glance. This only works with clear dashboards and directly usable reports – without complicated exports to Excel or external tools.
  • Integrated visitor management: If external guests regularly come to the office, the tool should be prepared for this. This includes features such as digital registration, on-site check-in and automatic notification of the contact person – ideally directly via the same interface.
  • Reliable mobile use: Bookings on the go must be quick and reliable – regardless of the device used. Long loading times, a lack of overview or technical glitches slow down the workflow. A good tool is just as powerful on mobile as it is on desktop.

5 desk.ly alternatives in comparison

#1 PULT – More than just desk booking

PULT is a comprehensive tool for managing workplaces, meeting rooms, events and visitors. It is aimed at companies that want to digitally map their entire office organization.

PULT features and benefits

  • Booking of desks, rooms, zones and parking spaces
  • Real-time overview with display of free places
  • Mobile use in a browser or via an app
  • Event and meeting planning
  • Visitor management with check-in
  • Integrations with, among others, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Google Workspace
  • Feedback and analysis functions for office utilization

The management options offer precise analyses and are able to identify patterns. This way, you can find out why some offices, individual places or locations are not well received. Managers receive feedback from their employees about their well-being via PULT and can thus better respond to the team – even from a distance.

PULT pricing model

From €1.90 per user per month. Inactive users are free. A free demo can be booked via the website. Specific offers are available on request via the website.

Who is PULT for?

For companies that need more than Desk Booking. Ideal for hybrid teams with a need for meetings and visitor operations, who find PULT to be a very comprehensive software. Since PULT can be integrated with numerous other software, it should be suitable for most companies.

{{cta}}

#2 Flexopus – Visual booking with map view

Flexopus offers an interactive map view where workplaces, rooms and parking spaces can be booked. This makes the tool particularly interesting for larger areas and multiple floors.

Features and benefits of Flexopus

  • Booking of workplaces, rooms and parking spaces
  • Interactive map view of office space
  • Visitor management and usage analysis
  • Role and rights management
  • Integrations with Outlook, Teams, Google Calendar and much more

Pricing model from Flexopus

30 days free trial. After that, from €1.59 per resource (space, room, etc.) per month. Premium features from €2.99.

Who is Flexopus suitable for?

Companies with large or complex areas that benefit from the map view. Also useful for multiple locations.

#3 Skedda – floor plans, rules and smart sharing

Skedda manages desks, rooms and resources using interactive floor plans. With a wide range of booking rules and integrations, it is aimed at companies with structured capacity utilization.

Skedda features and benefits

  • Interactive office floor plans for booking
  • Customizable booking rules and periods
  • Integration with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace and others
  • Mobile access on all devices
  • Analytics and reports for office utilization

Skedda pricing

From $99 per month (15 rooms, unlimited users). Larger packages start at $149 and $199. Visitor management costs extra.

Who is Skedda suitable for?

For structured environments with predictable capacities. More suited to medium-sized to large companies, even across multiple locations.

#4 Robin – focus on space planning and utilization

Robin combines desk booking with utilization analysis and team planning. Particularly strong in space management and strategic capacity planning.

Robin features and benefits

  • Real-time overview of available seats
  • Booking of desks, rooms and areas
  • Interactive maps
  • “Who's in” feature shows colleagues present
  • Zone management and booking rules
  • In-depth evaluations and usage trends
  • Integration with Slack, Outlook, Google Workspace

Robin pricing model

No public prices. Demo available on request.

Who is Robin suitable for?

According to the provider, for companies with 500 or more employees, of whom at least 150 regularly come to the office.

#5 Condeco – classic room and workplace management

Condeco is an established tool for larger companies. In addition to desk booking, it offers room planning, visitor management and analysis functions.

Features and benefits of Condeco

  • Workplace and room reservation
  • Visitor and reception management
  • Mobile booking and check-in via app
  • Integration with Microsoft tools
  • Reports on room utilization
  • Kiosk systems and touch panels as add-ons

Pricing model from Condeco

No public prices. Offers are made individually.

Who is Condeco suitable for?

For large companies with clear IT structures and central requirements for room and visitor management.

desk.ly alternative – This is how PULT impresses

All providers in this comparison of desk.ly alternatives go beyond the basic functions of Desk Booking. You can find parking space booking, organization of meeting rooms – even with catering, visitor management and analysis functions. Please note that some of the features are only included in the higher price tiers of the providers.

Desk Booking with PULT starts at just €1.90 per month and comes with over 50 integrations. This means that your team doesn't have to leave Slack or Office to book desks or rooms. The idea behind it: What works simply is also used. PULT is a convincing alternative with:

  • 1-click desk booking
  • Planning of remote days & who's-where overview
  • Meeting room management incl. catering
  • Parking space booking
  • Visitor management with automatic check-in
  • Analysis functions at the workplace level
  • Over 50 integrations (MS Teams, Slack, M365, and many more)

PULT is constantly being developed. Functions for incoming parcels and deliveries will be added soon. These will then be reported to your team and do not have to be managed individually. In addition, there is also the reporting function, which colleagues can use to immediately report defects and other problems at their workplaces.

{{hint-box}}

Desk.ly alternative – frequently asked questions

Alternatives

5 Powerful Deskbird Alternatives for Desk Booking

In hybrid offices, half of the desks are often empty. Desk booking software can help here. But Desk Booking has to be the right fit for the company, not the other way around. Alongside Deskbird, there are a number of powerful tools that offer different approaches and strengths.

Deskbird Alternatives: 5 Great Desk Booking Tools to Suit You

IIn this article, you will find five strong alternatives to Deskbird. You will learn about their features, who they are suitable for – and how they differ in price. This way, you can decide for yourself which desk booking software suits your team and your daily work.

Important selection criteria for desk booking software as an alternative to Deskbird

Before you decide on an alternative, it's worth taking a quick look at the selection criteria. After all, every organization works differently – and not every tool is suitable for every setup. These four points will help you to better understand what is on offer:

  • Intuitive access and user-friendliness: If you want your team to actually use the software, it has to be easy to understand from day one. Good software doesn't require long training sessions – ideally, new employees can get started right away.
  • Customization options: The alternative software should adapt to your company – not the other way around. This includes, for example, the ability to map different locations, rooms or usage rules. Different roles and rights are also helpful.
  • Integration: The better a tool integrates into your existing infrastructure, the less friction there will be. Many teams work with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace or Slack – so it makes sense if the new system comes with interfaces to these applications.

Range of functions: Good desk booking software can do more than just manage workplaces. Ideally, it should also offer the option of booking meeting rooms, planning events or receiving visitors. Functions such as zone management, a real-time overview or mobile booking make a difference in your day-to-day work. This saves you from having to use different software for each individual function.

5 Deskbird alternatives compared

#1 PULT – booking, workplace management and more

PULT is versatile and goes far beyond the classic basic functions of booking software. In addition to workplace booking, PULT also covers room planning, event organization and visitor registration. This makes PULT particularly suitable for companies that want to manage their entire office organization using a single tool.

PULT features and benefits

  • Clear management of desks, rooms and zones
  • Real-time overview of available workstations
  • Mobile booking via app or in the browser – even when working from home
  • Planning and organization of events and meetings
  • Integration with Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Slack and more
  • Visitor management including check-in and notification of the contact person

PULT is designed so that employees can immediately see which places are available and how they can book them. The same applies to booking rooms, zones and parking spaces.

The management options offer precise analyses and reveal patterns. This helps to find out why some locations, offices or individual places are not accepted. Managers receive feedback from their employees about their well-being via PULT and can thus respond better to the team – even from a distance.

PULT pricing model

PULT is available from €1.90 per user per month. It is possible to set individual users to inactive and thus save costs. Concrete offers are available on request via the website. A free product demonstration is available on the website and you can book a live demo.

Who is PULT suitable for?

PULT is a good fit for companies that want more than just desk booking. In particular, teams that have to coordinate many meetings or regularly receive external visitors will find PULT to be a very comprehensive software. Since PULT can be integrated with numerous other software, it should be suitable for most companies.

{{cta}}

#2 desk.ly – Booking, Rules and Analytics

desk.ly is aimed at companies looking for a lean booking software. The tool focuses on the essential functions of booking workplaces, meeting rooms and parking spaces. However, it also offers weekly overviews, displaying attendances and analysis options.

Features and benefits of desk.ly

  • Booking of workplaces and meeting rooms
  • Support for flexible working models (e.g. office/home office switching)
  • Integration with Microsoft Teams and Outlook
  • User roles for admins and team leaders
  • Mobile use on all end devices

Team leaders can use desk.ly to coordinate their employees' work locations, which is particularly helpful in larger departments. The interface is modern, logically structured and well thought out – so everyone can find their way around without any introduction.

desk.ly pricing

desk.ly uses a user-based pricing model, which is available for free for up to 15 users. The Corporate package is available from €1.65 per month and user. More features are available in Enterprise from €2.20 per user per month – including a mobile app, rights and roles, individual booking rules and more.

Who is desk.ly suitable for?

According to their own statements, desk.ly customers include companies of all sizes. If you are looking for a lean software for hybrid work and don't want to miss out on some advanced features, you will find it at desk.ly.

#3 Flexopus – Clear booking with map view

Flexopus is a desk booking software that offers, among other things, the booking of workplaces, meeting rooms and parking spaces. The visual representation of office space as an interactive map view is one of its most well-known features. The tool has a strong visual structure and offers clear structures for booking and administration.

Features and benefits of Flexopus

  • Booking of workplaces, meeting rooms and parking spaces
  • Interactive map view of office space
  • Visitor management
  • Analytics, group management
  • Integration with Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Google Calendar and many more
  • Role and rights management

Flexopus places a high value on intuitive operation. The map view shows employees exactly where their workplace is located and which places are still available. Colleagues can be found on the live plan. Mobile use via an app has also been considered.

Pricing model from Flexopus

Flexopus can be tested free of charge for 30 days. The prices are based on the resources used per month (number of workstations, rooms, parking spaces, etc.), starting at €1.59. For €2.99 per resource and month, functions such as single sign-on, statistics and evaluations, as well as further integration options, are added.

Who is Flexopus suitable for?

Flexopus is suitable for companies that are looking for a visually strong solution with a clear area structure. The map view is particularly advantageous where several locations and floors need to be managed. If you are looking for a highly visual tool with a solid range of functions, Flexopus is a reliable option.

#4 Robin – For teams with a focus on space and planning

Robin is designed for booking seats and rooms, organizing meetings, visitor management and analytics. At its core is a platform that facilitates both individual booking and strategic utilization planning.

Robin's features and benefits

  • Automated workplace booking based on individual office hours
  • Interactive map view with real-time information on available desks
  • Booking of desks, meeting rooms and other office spaces
  • Display of which colleagues are also on site (“who's in” feature)
  • Management of multiple locations in a central interface
  • Rules for booking periods and zones
  • Analysis of the utilization of workstations and rooms

Robin integrates directly with tools like Outlook, Google Workspace and Slack, so bookings can be made without changing systems. The mobile app enables spontaneous reservations. Automatic reminders and the release of unused seats improve utilization. Role rights and team planning ensure an overview.

Robin's pricing model

Robin no longer displays prices on the website. A free demo can be booked for an initial insight.

Who is Robin suitable for?

According to Robin, its services are aimed at companies with 500 or more employees, of whom at least 150 regularly use the office.

#5 Skedda – Book workplaces with interactive floor plans

Skedda is a booking software for managing workplaces, meeting rooms and other resources. With interactive floor plans and many customization options, Skedda offers a comprehensive software.

Skedda's features and benefits

  • Floor plans: Visualization of office space for booking desks and rooms.
  • Booking rules: Customizable conditions for booking periods, cancellations and usage rights.
  • Integration with calendar services: Synchronization with Microsoft 365, Google and many more
  • Accessibility: Use on smartphones and tablets to enable bookings from anywhere.
  • Analysis and reporting functions: Insights into the use of workplaces and rooms to optimize office utilization.

Skedda also offers features such as single sign-on, self-service check-ins and advanced role rights. This allows access to be controlled and certain processes to be automated. It is also possible to manage multiple locations or areas within a company – including individual settings for each location.

Skedda pricing model

Skedda can be tested for free. The various price plans are available from $99 per month for up to 15 rooms, including interactive floor plans and an unlimited number of users. The mid-range package with the Insight dashboard starts at $149, and the largest package at $199. Visitor management can be added for $99 per month.

Who is Skedda suitable for?

Skedda does not specify the appropriate company size for its customers. Since the smallest package only represents one office layout, smaller companies are also part of the target group. There is no upper limit.

Deskbird Alternative – This is how PULT impresses

All providers in this comparison of Deskbird alternatives go beyond the basic functions of Desk Booking. They offer parking space booking, meeting room organization with catering, visitor management and analysis options. Note that some of the features are only available at the higher price levels.

Desk booking with PULT starts at just €1.90 per month and comes with over 50 integration options. This means your team doesn't have to leave Slack or Office to book places or rooms. The idea behind it is: what simply works will also be used.

  • Workplace booking: 1-click desk booking for your hybrid workplace
  • Room booking: manage meeting rooms including catering and display them in the calendar
  • Hybrid Work Planner: Plan remote days and team events, including a who-is-where function
  • Visitor Management: Receive and guide visitors safely
  • Insights & Analytics: Deep insights into the usage data of all workplaces, rooms, etc.
  • Parking Space Booking: Book parking spaces in advance
  • Wifi Connect: Automatic check-in as soon as colleagues are on the WLAN

The fact that PULT is constantly being developed can be seen from the new features that will soon be added. Incoming parcels and deliveries will then be reported to your team and do not have to be managed individually by reception. In addition, there is the reporting function, which allows colleagues to immediately report defects and other problems at their workstations.

{{hint-box}}

Deskbird alternative – frequently asked questions

Office Insights

Desk Sharing Experiences, Problems & Solutions

Desk sharing boosts collaboration and cuts costs when staff shape plans, right ratios are set, and smart tech smooths the experience.

Desk Sharing Experiences of Companies and Employees

You are considering whether desk sharing makes sense for your company? Then take an honest look at what happens when employees lose their fixed desk. The largest German-language study on this topic brings sobering figures to light: only 25 % of employees prefer shared workstations, while half would rather return to a fixed desk.

The DGUV survey with 1,996 participants is the first scientifically sound analysis of psychological stress factors in desk sharing in the German-speaking world. The results reveal a gap between what companies hope for and what their employees actually experience.

In parallel, companies such as Siemens Munich demonstrably save €550,000 per year with their desk-sharing concept. Reality lies between these extremes—complex and heavily dependent on how you implement it.

Descriptive Studies on Desk Sharing Experiences

The DGUV study marks a turning point in the desk-sharing debate. For the first time, psychological stress factors were examined systematically, and the results dispel some myths. While 60 % of employees are predominantly satisfied with the system, that also means 40 % have had problematic desk sharing experiences.

Especially interesting are the productivity data: 30 % report negative effects on their performance. The main disruptive factor is other people constantly walking through the office. One quarter of respondents experience this distraction daily.

Tip: At the end of the article you will find measures to avoid these and other problems in desk sharing.

The health balance shows a similar pattern: while 60 % see no change, 25 % suffer negative health effects. Particularly problematic: one third are fundamentally bothered by not having their own fixed workspace.

Even more dramatic are the findings from Harvard. Using sensor technology, researchers measured what really happens when companies switch to open-office concepts: face-to-face communication drops by up to 70 %, while email traffic rises by 22 % to 50 % to compensate—the opposite of what companies hope for.

Desk Sharing Experiences of Companies

Siemens ICN Munich is considered a reference case for successful implementation. With a desk-sharing ratio of 55:100, i.e., 110 workstations for 200 employees, the company achieves savings of €550,000 per year, projected to €1.1 million after five years. Branch manager Günter Dependahl emphasizes an important point: creating an attractive working environment in return was critical.

The Krones AG chose a different path and used the Corona pandemic for a gradual rollout. Redesigning the office space created attractive workplaces and retreats. The machinery manufacturer integrated booking software with “Favourite-Spot” functions so employees can reserve preferred desks.

But there is also a dark side: over 50 % of employees had no say in the introduction. The DGUV study shows that this leads to significantly worse satisfaction, health, and performance. In 30 % of companies, managers are excluded from desk sharing—a signal that undermines the concept’s credibility among staff.

Desk Sharing Experiences of Employees

Beyond HR wishes and corporate studies, a different picture emerges when you look at authentic employee voices. The most common complaints in ongoing desk sharing operations are time loss due to daily seat hunting, loss of personal workplace identity, and stress in the search for a workstation.

The practical problems dominate everyday work: “The effort of first finding a free desk each day, connecting the technology, and setting up the workspace is greater than with a fixed desk,” employees report. Twenty percent need four minutes or more every day just to search for and reserve a seat.

Territorial behavior plays a greater role than expected. Occupational psychologist Prof. Wilhelm Glaser from the University of Tübingen explains:

{{hint-box}}

43 % feel pressured to secure a good workstation, while 44 % feel more anonymous in the company.

There are, however, also positive desk sharing experiences, especially from younger, digitally-savvy employees: new contacts, interdisciplinary exchange, and variety in everyday work.

Technical Implementation of Desk Sharing: Experiences and Hidden Costs

Technical implementation often proves more costly and complex than originally calculated. For 100 fully equipped workstations, total investment costs amount to between €145,000 and €310,000, with booking software alone costing €2,400–6,000 per year.

Smart-locker systems for personal items add another €30,000–60,000 for 100 workstations. IT challenges include increased support effort due to changing users, complex software licensing for shared desks, and high demands on WLAN capacity.

Hygiene standards require daily basic cleaning and weekly deep cleaning, adding operating costs of €8,000–15,000 per year. These costs are often underestimated—or completely forgotten—in profitability calculations.

Where Desk Sharing Reaches Its Limits

Works councils sometimes offer legal resistance to desk-sharing implementations. The regional labor courts (LAG) of Düsseldorf and Baden-Württemberg confirmed co-determination rights, especially regarding rules on personal items and health protection.

Certain workplaces are unsuitable for desk sharing:

  • Video editing stations with high-performance workstations
  • Laboratory workplaces with calibrated measuring devices in the pharmaceutical or automotive industries
  • CAD workplaces with specialized graphics tablets in design engineering
  • Workstations with multi-monitor setups for financial analysis or trading
  • Corporate areas with confidential data such as patent departments or HR offices
  • Traditional manufacturing industries
  • Activities with strict hygiene regulations such as food processing or clean rooms

Failed desk-sharing implementations typically result from employee resistance, technical problems with booking systems, unresolved hygiene issues, and productivity losses that outweigh cost savings. Long-term consequences are increasingly visible: chronic stress due to daily uncertainty, social isolation despite physical proximity, and identity loss due to lack of spatial anchoring.

Positive Desk Sharing Experiences: Implementing the Concept Correctly

Successful desk-sharing rollouts consistently follow clear patterns: early employee involvement (currently only 30 % receive this), transparent communication, and comprehensive change-management programs. Siemens’ eight-month planning process with intensive communication is regarded as best practice.

Equal treatment of all hierarchy levels is critical here. Siemens’ role-model function through second-level management creates credibility among staff. The technical infrastructure must guarantee 99.5 % uptime, and booking systems must require a maximum of three clicks to reserve.

Tip: PULT even works without a click. Here you can find more about PULT Presence.

Spatial quality functions as an important “return” for the savings the company makes: high-quality, ergonomic workplaces; various zones such as quiet concentration areas with privacy screens, open collaboration zones with whiteboards and presentation technology, and lounge areas for conversations; and sufficient retreats for focused work.

50 % of employees currently have suitable retreats, which, however, correlate significantly with higher satisfaction.

The optimal desk-sharing ratio lies between 0.67 and 0.83—i.e., 67 to 83 workstations per 100 employees. This ratio depends on the remote-work rate and travel activity. Ratios that are too low lead to stress caused by seat shortages.

How to Avoid Negative Desk Sharing Experiences

Studies clearly show where the problematic experiences with desk sharing lie. From these findings, measures can be derived to create a better desk-sharing experience in your company:

Problem #1: 25 % experience daily distractions, mainly from people walking past.
Solution: Plan defined walkways away from workstations and create quiet zones with privacy screens for focused work. Routing can be deliberately guided with room dividers and large plants, sparing employees from distractions.

Problem #2: 50 % of employees have no say in the rollout.
Solution: Conduct the planning process with regular employee surveys, workshops, and pilot phases. Siemens shows that intensive communication is a key factor for success.

Problem #3: 30 % of companies exclude managers from desk sharing.
Solution: Introduce desk sharing across all hierarchy levels. Management must lead by example to create the necessary credibility.

Problem #4: 20 % need more than four minutes daily to find a seat.
Solution: Implement a truly intuitive booking system with a maximum of three clicks to reserve, with filter options so employees can quickly find the right place.

Problem #5: 43 % feel pressured to find a good workstation and/or have to book very far in advance.
Solution: Keep the desk-sharing ratio at 0.67–0.83 (67–83 workstations per 100 employees) and plan buffer capacity.

Problem #6: 44 % feel more anonymous due to desk sharing.
Solution: Deliberately create encounter zones such as lounge areas and plan regular team events to maintain and foster social cohesion.

Problem #7: 33 % are fundamentally bothered by not having a fixed desk.
Solution: Offer “value in return” through high-quality, ergonomic workstations and various work zones. Invest in spatial quality.

Problem #8: Loss of personal workplace identity.
Solution: Provide ample lockers or mobile lockable pedestals and allow limited personalization of workstations.

Problem #9: 25 % suffer negative health effects.
Solution: Ensure ergonomic workstations with height-adjustable desks, good lighting, and noise protection. Plan sufficient retreats.

Problem #10: Technical problems and increased support effort.
Solution: Guarantee 99.5 % uptime of IT infrastructure, plan sufficient WLAN capacity, and train IT support for the specific requirements of desk sharing.

Ensuring a Positive Desk Sharing Experience with Software

Many of the issues mentioned can be avoided by choosing the right software. In its desk-booking software, PULT addresses desk-sharing challenges: zero-click booking via WiFi eliminates daily seat hunting—employees automatically check in when their smartphone connects to the office WiFi.

The software integrates directly into existing tools such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, or Outlook, so no additional software needs to be learned. Filter functions for equipment (standing desks, monitors, docking stations) and the display of colleague locations encourage conscious seat selection instead of random desk hunting.

Through detailed office analytics and real-time occupancy data, you as a decision-maker can make evidence-based capacity decisions and optimally adjust the desk-sharing ratio. Over 1,000 companies already use PULT successfully—from start-ups to corporations such as Fielmann or Urban Sports Club.

Tip: Here you can find our customers’ experiences.

{{cta}}

Desk Sharing Experiences – Frequently Asked Questions and Answers